Page 1 of 1

Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 7:37 pm
by jaynana

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:51 pm
by X5Sport
It's an Evoque with rounded bits......and will sell very well.

R

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 10:38 pm
by snipez999
How do they get the wheels to go in reverse like that?!

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:32 am
by X5Sport
[quote="snipez999"]
How do they get the wheels to go in reverse like that?!
[/quote]

That's a secret O:-).  If we told you then everyone would be doing it..... :P

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 8:20 pm
by shadrack
looks ok, would be nice as a 5.0sc

Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:07 pm
by snipez999
Yes but how many would buy one?  Id rather wait for the  Bentley SUV  due around . same time

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Mon Nov 11, 2013 11:08 pm
by snipez999
Oops typos abound after 2 bottles of Veuve sorry!

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 9:17 am
by X5Sport
The Bentley will be a disguised Q7!  And not everyone has the funding to buy one, whereas the Jag will be a RRS in disguise.  My other half thinks the Jag is very Audiesqe anyway.  That takes it off any buy list as she hates Audi.  Don't know why other than most of the ones (A3 & A4) around here are rep-wagons and driven badly.  A bit like 320d cars.

Richard

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:34 am
by jaynana
i love the new jag designs.

its actually based on the XF, not a landie evoque..

Re: Jaguar CX-17

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:38 am
by jaynana
[quote="X5Sport"]
My other half thinks the Jag is very Audiesqe anyway. 
[/quote]

probably because it looks very bling. lol

my first impression was i loved the exterior. the interior is mostly crap concept stuff, that will change.

the pretend comedians have had a go..