Page 2 of 3
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 11:00 pm
by Chompers
[quote="535dboy"]
Do all these people that swear by them actually no what they are swearing by !?!!
[/quote]
+1 Exactly
@CR55 - there are only 2 reasons for worn centres on rear tyres. 1, over inflation 2, constant standing start hard acceleration. There won't be a kwik fit in the country that can sort central wear out via geometry. It's a driver fix
Tyre choices all comes back to personal preference and informed/or not choice. These are the things that attach your pride and joy to the road and hopefully keep you and your family/passengers safe.
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 5:10 pm
by JimmySpeed
My 4.6is came on Kumho's - never had them before but have had Falkens and Michelins and Pirellis and Dunlops on RWD BMW's over the years.
I noticed the difference only in snow on the RWD cars which performed well on Dunlops but not Falkens. On the 4WD X5 in the snow the Kumho's were brilliant, but I would expect that from a 4WD 4x4 anyway. Normal driving the Kumho's are very good. Safety concerns - I have none. Would a premium brand be better on wet track - yes, of course but I will never find myself there so for a 4WD 4x4 on the 'road', I can't say that I would happily pay double for a premium tyre.
I would however get a GOOD set of part worns (5mm + all over) in premium before buying new budget. If you know what you are looking for and inspect in person before purchase this works out well. I do low miles so tyres always last me absolutely ages.
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 11:18 pm
by 535dboy
[quote="mobilejo"]
My 4.6is came on Kumho's - never had them before but have had Falkens and Michelins and Pirellis and Dunlops on RWD BMW's over the years.
I noticed the difference only in snow on the RWD cars which performed well on Dunlops but not Falkens. On the 4WD X5 in the snow the Kumho's were brilliant, but I would expect that from a 4WD 4x4 anyway. Normal driving the Kumho's are very good. Safety concerns - I have none. Would a premium brand be better on wet track - yes, of course but I will never find myself there so for a 4WD 4x4 on the 'road', I can't say that I would happily pay double for a premium tyre.
I would however get a GOOD set of part worns (5mm + all over) in premium before buying new budget. If you know what you are looking for and inspect in person before purchase this works out well. I do low miles so tyres always last me absolutely ages.
[/quote]
Is there an echo around here!?!?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 12:37 am
by JimmySpeed
[quote="535dboy"]
[quote="mobilejo"]
My 4.6is came on Kumho's - never had them before but have had Falkens and Michelins and Pirellis and Dunlops on RWD BMW's over the years.
I noticed the difference only in snow on the RWD cars which performed well on Dunlops but not Falkens. On the 4WD X5 in the snow the Kumho's were brilliant, but I would expect that from a 4WD 4x4 anyway. Normal driving the Kumho's are very good. Safety concerns - I have none. Would a premium brand be better on wet track - yes, of course but I will never find myself there so for a 4WD 4x4 on the 'road', I can't say that I would happily pay double for a premium tyre.
I would however get a GOOD set of part worns (5mm + all over) in premium before buying new budget. If you know what you are looking for and inspect in person before purchase this works out well. I do low miles so tyres always last me absolutely ages.
[/quote]
Is there an echo around here!?!?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
[/quote]
No point letting a good post like that go to waste on the wrong thread is there?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de23e/de23e0b2d55fe25ef965419161c894c2b104540a" alt="Wink ;)"
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Sun Apr 14, 2013 6:59 am
by 535dboy
[quote="mobilejo"]
[quote="535dboy"]
[quote="mobilejo"]
My 4.6is came on Kumho's - never had them before but have had Falkens and Michelins and Pirellis and Dunlops on RWD BMW's over the years.
I noticed the difference only in snow on the RWD cars which performed well on Dunlops but not Falkens. On the 4WD X5 in the snow the Kumho's were brilliant, but I would expect that from a 4WD 4x4 anyway. Normal driving the Kumho's are very good. Safety concerns - I have none. Would a premium brand be better on wet track - yes, of course but I will never find myself there so for a 4WD 4x4 on the 'road', I can't say that I would happily pay double for a premium tyre.
I would however get a GOOD set of part worns (5mm + all over) in premium before buying new budget. If you know what you are looking for and inspect in person before purchase this works out well. I do low miles so tyres always last me absolutely ages.
[/quote]
Is there an echo around here!?!?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
[/quote]
No point letting a good post like that go to waste on the wrong thread is there?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de23e/de23e0b2d55fe25ef965419161c894c2b104540a" alt="Wink ;)"
[/quote]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de23e/de23e0b2d55fe25ef965419161c894c2b104540a" alt="Wink ;)"
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:03 pm
by Shez1878
Took it for its first motorway spin today. Reached some interesting speeds. Tyres didn't miss a beat. Didn't notice any real difference in braking distance either.
Real test will be in the wet but so far, so good.
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:07 pm
by 535dboy
[quote="Shez1878"]
Took it for its first motorway spin today. Reached some interesting speeds. Tyres didn't miss a beat. Didn't notice any real difference in breaking distance either.
Real test will be in the wet but so far, so good.
[/quote]
What did you break whilst your were braking?
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:11 pm
by Shez1878
Don't know what you mean...
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:12 pm
by 535dboy
[quote="Shez1878"]
Don't know what you mean...
[/quote]
Spelling!
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:14 pm
by Shez1878
Yeah. What's wrong with it? Looks ok to me b-r-a-k-i-n-g!
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:16 pm
by 535dboy
[quote="Shez1878"]
Yeah. What's wrong with it? Looks ok to me b-r-a-k-i-n-g!
[/quote]
Was wrong but you've changed it but unfortunately for you it is in my quote of your post so no escape of the error!
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:17 pm
by Shez1878
Bloody heck. This has become hard work.
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 1:28 am
by Johnell
Which Kumhos are you guys actually talking about? Just stating the make of a tyre and not the actual model is like stating you drive a BMW, technically correct but not quite enough info to be interesting
I'm not having a pop, just trying to decide which 275/40/20s to put on the front of mine.
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:02 am
by Shez1878
Kumho Ecsta X3
Re: The Kumho's are on!
Posted: Wed Apr 24, 2013 10:06 am
by JimmySpeed
[quote="535dboy"]
[quote="Shez1878"]
Yeah. What's wrong with it? Looks ok to me b-r-a-k-i-n-g!
[/quote]
Was wrong but you've changed it but unfortunately for you it is in my quote of your post so no escape of the error!
[/quote]
Brilliant!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78b66/78b6672191129216e0ffbe8878d11f7148bc935c" alt="Smile :)"
)
Shez i love the fact that you went back and corrected it!