Post
by 55NF » Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:55 pm
[quote="germancars"]
I think I have been lucky with my other cars. figures advertised and what i got where not that different. I am actually a BMW fan but This fuel discrepancy is just not like what I am used to. After reading all comments I do not think it will improve much. I regret not buying X 5 M model.
[/quote]
With respect, you say you're concious of the environmental implications of the 40d & projected MPG as quoted by BMW not matching up to their quoted figures, but then say yoiu wish you'd bought the X5M ... which is a about as unenvironmentally friendly as you can buy? The 40d is the best car I've owned in 25 years & I really don't give a damn about the media driven environmental drivel..... Afterall, in comparison to the UK - China and India account for approx 75% percent of the worlds pollution, so all 20 millon UK cars won;t make that much difference in 20 years, in comparison.
Back to the car. I've had my 61 plate 12 months, i was achieving 22 MPG when I collected the car. I now get 26 around town & 37ish on motorway at 60mph. The real world BMW figures are misleading I agree & I too was disappointed with MPG when I first got the car, but the extra fuel has maybe cost me another 150 GBP over 12 months.
Porsche Macan
Golf GTD MK8
A4 Avant Blk Ed /Merc E350 / X5 E70 40d M Sport / C350 CDI Sport / 335d M Sport / 997 C2S / CLS 320 CDI / E46 M3 X2 / Z3 2.8 / 225 TTC / Mini Cooper JCW / 330ci / 325ci, Pug 205 1.9 GTI, Ren 5 Gt Turbo / Nova Merit