Not joined yet? Register for free and enjoy features such as alerts, private messaging and viewing latest posts and topics.

Rubbernecking' motorists

General car related chat
Post Reply
Peter_R

Rubbernecking' motorists

Post by Peter_R » Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:07 am

?
Last edited by Peter_R on Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mars
Member
Member
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:12 pm
Location: Hell's Kitchen

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by Mars » Tue Jul 14, 2015 10:18 am

I think you have to be physically in contact with the device for it to be constituted as illegal.
2014 3.0d M Sport (the snail)
Porsche Macan ordered 2017

User avatar
pvr
Lifer
Lifer
Posts: 5254
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:13 pm
Location: West Sussex

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by pvr » Tue Jul 14, 2015 9:29 pm

Bit of a strange law. An iPod touch is fully legal to control  / hold for music and anything else.

An iPhone, doing the same thing, but it has a SIM in it - is illegal to hold.

A walkie talkie is fine to use as well - but a phone with walkie talkie facility is not as there is a SIM in there.
X5M F85,  Golf Clipper, Abarth 595 Competizioni, Jeep

911 50th anniversary -
Site & Forum Admin Team Member.

User avatar
Mars
Member
Member
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 3:12 pm
Location: Hell's Kitchen

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by Mars » Tue Jul 14, 2015 11:18 pm

How can an iPod touch be ok to hold and and not a phone? One could be scrolling through a playlist trying to find 'You Can Leave Your Hat On' and be just as dangerous.
Rubberneckers are strange folk - never understood that mindset.
IQ aka Mars
2014 3.0d M Sport (the snail)
Porsche Macan ordered 2017

User avatar
X5Sport
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 18781
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:09 pm
Location: Planet X6......

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by X5Sport » Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:06 pm

No it isn't.  You get dealt with for driving without due care, or not being in proper control of a motor vehicle, rather than the very specific phone offence.

Some insurers are cancelling policies of those with mobile phone convictions.  Absolutely right too, especially those driving trucks.
:ant: Never anthropomorphise computers. They hate that.

User avatar
shadrack
Snr Member
Snr Member
Posts: 2631
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: north yorkshire

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by shadrack » Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:33 pm

[quote="X5Sport"]
No it isn't.  You get dealt with for driving without due care, or not being in proper control of a motor vehicle, rather than the very specific phone offence.

Some insurers are cancelling policies of those with mobile phone convictions.  Absolutely right too, especially those driving trucks.
[/quote]

i personally agree, i dont drive on the phone however i used to years ago, i would say many people would still be better drivers and more aware of their surroundings than some of the idiots that are not aware of anything further than the end of their bonnet.
Also a conversation / arguement with someone in the car could be way more distracting than a phone.

Please note im meaning a phone conversation holding phone agains ear, there is no way when these people are reading facebook, texts etc that they are safe and aware, i just mean having a phone against ear is bearly any different to a handfree, especially in an auto car.
current: 2016 Vw Crafter
              2007 318d touring
              2008 Transit sport van            
              1964 vw beach buggy
              1988 e30 325i convertible

User avatar
X5Sport
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 18781
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 4:09 pm
Location: Planet X6......

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by X5Sport » Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:35 pm

Personally ?I prefer not to use the phone whilst mobile, even hands free.

The folks I work for, and the RAF who's vehicles I occasionally use, ban mobile use completely unless parked.
:ant: Never anthropomorphise computers. They hate that.

User avatar
shadrack
Snr Member
Snr Member
Posts: 2631
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: north yorkshire

Re: Rubbernecking' motorists face court over claims they took snaps of pile-up

Post by shadrack » Wed Jul 15, 2015 9:36 pm

[quote="X5Sport"]
Personally ?I prefer not to use the phone whilst mobile, even hands free.

The folks I work for, and the RAF who's vehicles I occasionally use, ban mobile use completely unless parked.
[/quote]

When i used to do it it was legal!  then a £30 fine, stopped when the points came in, just saying you can be on a phone and be safe and aware, just as you can be not on the phone but looking somewhere else and still crash.

To the original post i think its sick people videoing crash scenes as in the days of todays social media etc it could be possible family members etc see the footage before police have had time to work out who people are
current: 2016 Vw Crafter
              2007 318d touring
              2008 Transit sport van            
              1964 vw beach buggy
              1988 e30 325i convertible

Post Reply